OCP Governance Structure
The Open Carbon Protocol (OCP) has been designed from inception to administer issued carbon credits, methodologies, and associated integrity obligations over a multi-decadal time horizon.
Key Principles
Consistent, accurate carbon accounting across all types of projects
'Quality' = consensus of relevant expertise (both academic, industry, and from within the market)
High quality should be the baseline for the industry (confidence + accuracy), reached through our process that uses industry-leading practices from ICVCM and modelled after the peer review process.
Governance should drive three objectives: transparency, accountability & quality.
Transparency drives accountability, openness, and education. We provide the most open and transparent source of documents, processes, and data in the VCM.
Governance Model
OCP operates under a two-tier governance structure separating corporate fiduciary responsibility from program integrity oversight.
Oneshot.earth Inc. Board of Directors (OSE Board)
The OSE Board is the fiduciary governing body of Oneshot.earth Inc., the Delaware corporation that operates OCP. It holds ultimate legal and financial responsibility for the organisation: corporate strategy, financial management, and legal compliance. The OSE Bylaws govern its composition and operation. The current OSE Board consists of Thomas Annicq (Founder and CEO) and Jahed Momand (investor representative), appointed by board resolution in July 2026. Under the OSE Bylaws First Amendment (Article VII, July 2026), any action affecting the OCP Advisory Board's authority, composition, or governance framework requires majority OSE Board approval, providing an additional structural protection for Advisory Board independence.
OCP Advisory Board
The OCP Advisory Board is an independently constituted governance body with formally delegated authority over OCP program integrity matters, established by resolution of the OSE Board. It is not a committee of the OSE Board. Its authority and independence criteria are set out in the OCP Advisory Board Bylaws. The Advisory Board's decisions on program integrity matters are final and binding and cannot be overridden by OSE management or the OSE Board within the Advisory Board's delegated scope. See the OCP Advisory Board page for current membership, responsibilities, and decision-making procedures.
OSE and OCP Organizational Chart
OCP Key Function Responsibilities
Methodology Approval
Feedback on Methodology Drafts
Voting to Approve or Reject based on OCP Methodology Requirements and Voting Criteria
Independent Expert Panel. Methodology development and approval is completely independent of the OCP Registry and OCP team.
Methodology Process Administration
Recruiting and onboarding Expert Panel
Conflict of Interest management
Rio Richardson (Chief Product Officer) + Policy & Procedures team
Project and Registry Administration
Rio Richardson (Chief Product Officer) + Policy & Procedures team
VVB Onboarding and Oversight
Accreditation and Experience checks (on application and annually)
Onboarding and Oversight management
Conflict of Interest management
Rio Richardson (Chief Product Officer) + Policy & Procedures team
Material Program Changes
Updates to OCP Handbook and Decision Making
OCP Advisory Board
Financial Management
Budgeting and accounts
Financial reporting
Chris Fort (Chief Operating Officer) + Operations & Finance team. Subject to fiduciary oversight by OSE Board of Directors.
Updates to the OCP Handbook and Decision Making
The Open Carbon Protocol is constantly developing as market needs unfold and through feedback and improvements with our users. All changes are made with the guiding principles above, and we are always open to feedback at any time.
Rio Richardson, Chief Product Officer, is responsible for the administration and development of the platform. Decisions are made in consultation with the CEO, COO, and other team members. The OCP Advisory Board reviews and approves all material Handbook updates.
After the Handbook versions are finalized, they undergo a public commentary period. Feedback is listed on 'Handbook Version History + Public Commentary' and gets incorporated as described under the Stakeholder Engagement & Complaints section.
Last updated